Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Enhancing Clinical Data Analysis by Explaining Interaction Effects between Covariates in Deep Neural Network Models.
Shao, Yijun; Ahmed, Ali; Zamrini, Edward Y; Cheng, Yan; Goulet, Joseph L; Zeng-Treitler, Qing.
Affiliation
  • Shao Y; Department of Clinical Research and Leadership, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
  • Ahmed A; Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC 20422, USA.
  • Zamrini EY; Department of Clinical Research and Leadership, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
  • Cheng Y; Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC 20422, USA.
  • Goulet JL; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA.
  • Zeng-Treitler Q; Department of Clinical Research and Leadership, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
J Pers Med ; 13(2)2023 Jan 26.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36836451
Deep neural network (DNN) is a powerful technology that is being utilized by a growing number and range of research projects, including disease risk prediction models. One of the key strengths of DNN is its ability to model non-linear relationships, which include covariate interactions. We developed a novel method called interaction scores for measuring the covariate interactions captured by DNN models. As the method is model-agnostic, it can also be applied to other types of machine learning models. It is designed to be a generalization of the coefficient of the interaction term in a logistic regression; hence, its values are easily interpretable. The interaction score can be calculated at both an individual level and population level. The individual-level score provides an individualized explanation for covariate interactions. We applied this method to two simulated datasets and a real-world clinical dataset on Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD). We also applied two existing interaction measurement methods to those datasets for comparison. The results on the simulated datasets showed that the interaction score method can explain the underlying interaction effects, there are strong correlations between the population-level interaction scores and the ground truth values, and the individual-level interaction scores vary when the interaction was designed to be non-uniform. Another validation of our new method is that the interactions discovered from the ADRD data included both known and novel relationships.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: J Pers Med Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: J Pers Med Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: